ÖØ¿Ú50¶È»Ò

by Anthea Rutter

The question of what brings a person into the field of evaluation is always an interesting question to ask, particularly as you are never sure of the answer. In this case I did not expect the answer I got.

by Anthea Rutter

Chris Milne was an early pioneer in the use of program logic.  As a founding partner of ARTD Consultants, he has designed and delivered numerous evaluations across diverse sectors and built the evaluation capacity of government and non-government organisations. In recent years, he worked with another ÖØ¿Ú50¶È»ÒFellow, Patricia Rogers, on the NSW Government evaluation toolkit.

I enjoyed speaking with Chris. He struck me as a man with a high degree of humility, as well as someone who considers his answers in a balanced way. He is obviously committed to the environment and the world in which we live, and passionate about making it a good place for the generations that follow.

by Anthea Rutter

All of us in the ÖØ¿Ú50¶È»Òwere greatly shocked and saddened by the sudden death of Jenny Neale. Jenny had been a member of the ÖØ¿Ú50¶È»Ò for over 20 years and was an active contributor to the society both in her local Regional Network Committee in Wellington as well as a regular contributor at the ÖØ¿Ú50¶È»ÒInternational Conferences. 

Jenny was a Senior Research Fellow Health Services Research Centre, Faculty of Health, University of Wellington, New Zealand.

I interviewed Jenny last year and was rewarded by a frank discussion of life in the field of evaluation, its ups and downs and its frustrations!

by Anthea Rutter

Gill was named an ÖØ¿Ú50¶È»ÒFellow in 2018, and I was pleased to introduce her at the ÖØ¿Ú50¶È»Òconference in Launceston that year. We started with what brought her into the field of evaluation, and what it was about realist methodology that not only piqued her interest but now defines her as a practitioner.

by Anthea Rutter

Sue Funnell was one of the early trail blazers in evaluation methods. By her estimate, Sue has been in the profession for over 43 years. Over this time, she has held a number of roles in evaluation, including as the director of her own consulting company. She was a founding member of the AES, had two terms as President, was chair of the Awards Committee, and a presenter and trainer.

by Anthea Rutter

Anne and I have been colleagues and friends for many years. I have long been an admirer of her ability as a practical evaluator and I refer to Anne and Ian’s book frequently for my own practice. I caught up with Anne at the ÖØ¿Ú50¶È»ÒInternational Conference in Launceston, Tasmania, where we found time to share some lunch and some great conversation.

by Anthea Rutter

Interviewing John was a pleasure for me. He was my teacher at the Centre for Program Evaluation back in the 90s. Indeed, John and his colleagues have taught a large number of the members of the ÖØ¿Ú50¶È»Òover the years. John and I have also worked on projects together.

by Anthea Rutter

While Patricia Rogers is one of the most recently named Fellows, many of you will be familiar with her work from ÖØ¿Ú50¶È»Òconference keynotes, and her report on (with Greet Peersman). She is Professor of Public Sector Evaluation, RMIT University, and an award-winning evaluator, well known around the world.

While she is one busy lady, I managed to catch her at the last conference in Launceston, which was apt because conferences were a key thread in her reflections. 

by Anthea Rutter

Although a number of ÖØ¿Ú50¶È»Òmembers have founded consultancies to channel their evaluation work, it is another thing to think about – and actually achieve – the founding of a professional society. This is exactly what Emeritus Professor Anona Armstrong did. Through her company Evaluation Training & Services, the fledging society was born in the early 80s. Not only did Anona found the AES, she had the honour and distinction of having a piece of music written for her and performed at the ÖØ¿Ú50¶È»ÒInternational Conference in 1992.

by Anthea Rutter and the ÖØ¿Ú50¶È»ÒBlog Working Group

In evaluation, a good mentor can help you navigate the perplexing terrain of diverse schools of thought on what evaluation is about and how it should be done. Their guidance can help you avoid the pitfalls which can occur when you are translating a plan into practice. And their insight into where the profession of evaluation has been can help you shape where evaluation is going.

The 18 ÖØ¿Ú50¶È»ÒFellows have over 550 years of experience between them. There is certainly a lot we could learn from them.